Review packet

Evaluate the AI coding review gate in one page.

A fast packet for deciding whether Round Table Workspace is worth a star, directory listing, newsletter mention, or deeper local trial.

Star on GitHub One-minute demo 5-minute evaluation Mechanism

What it is

A local-first round-table review workflow for AI coding agents before trusting generated work.

Who it helps

Developers using Codex, Claude Code, and CLI agents for code, docs, launch copy, or architecture decisions.

What to check

Run the 5-minute local trial and look for a practical ship / revise / reject decision with evidence.

Fresh Clone Trial

No provider key is required for the default demo path.

git clone https://github.com/MarkDonish/round-table-workspace.git
cd round-table-workspace
./rtw demo startup-idea
./rtw ship-check "Should we merge this AI-generated feature?"
./rtw doctor --quick

Why It Is Different

Usual path	Round Table Workspace path
One AI answer sounds confident.	A small reviewer panel checks the answer.
Risks stay buried in a chat transcript.	Risks and missing evidence are written down.
The next step is vague.	The result is ship, revise, or reject.
Public claims can outrun evidence.	Claim boundaries stay tied to current validation.

Claim Boundary

Current public claim: local-first workflow and fixture-backed default demo path.
No provider key is required for the default demo.
No host-live or provider-live support is claimed without fresh evidence.
This does not replace tests, security review, or human ownership.

Copy-Safe Listing

Round Table Workspace

Local-first round-table review workflow for AI coding agents before trusting generated work.

Tags: ai-agents, ai-code-review, cli, codex, claude-code, local-first, ship-check, round-table