Practical workflows
Use it before one confident AI answer becomes trusted work.
Round Table Workspace fits the review moment: generated code, launch claims, architecture tradeoffs, vague MVPs, and team habits that need a local evidence trail.
$ ./rtw ship-check "Should we merge this AI-generated feature?"
Decision: revise
Why: useful direction, but tests and public claims need tightening
Next: add evidence, weaken unsupported wording, rerun checks
ship-check
Pre-merge AI review
Use when generated work looks ready but still needs evidence.
- missing tests
- unsupported claims
- ship / revise / reject
/room
MVP scope review
Use before a vague product idea turns into premature implementation.
- smallest useful demo
- riskiest assumption
- what not to build yet
/debate
Launch claim check
Use before publishing support, release, or social copy.
- claim boundary
- fresh evidence
- follow-up wording
/debate
Architecture tradeoff
Use when a refactor sounds convincing but may create maintenance drag.
- real second use case
- rollback path
- proof before merge
Team review ritual
A lightweight habit: run ./rtw doctor --quick, then run
ship-check before trusting generated work. The output stays
local-first and gives reviewers something more concrete than a chat
transcript.